Can AI Help Fix MTSS? Opportunities and the Risks
As school psychologists and educators, we know that multi-tiered systems of support (MTSS) offer a powerful framework for promoting equity and improving student outcomes. But implementing MTSS with fidelity is resource-intensive—requiring time, staffing, and robust data systems. That’s why some districts are beginning to ask: Can artificial intelligence (AI) help?
In a new conceptual article I co-authored with Dr. Kaitlin Reichart and Dr. Hank Bohanon we explore that question in depth. The preprint, titled AI-Driven Systems in MTSS: Potential Opportunities and Challenges, examines how AI tools are being used to support MTSS implementation, where they hold promise, and where they raise ethical concerns.
Why This Matters Now
MTSS is only as effective as the systems that support it. Schools face growing pressure to do more with less—more interventions, more progress monitoring, more data-based decisions—often with stagnant staffing and limited time. AI is already being used to:
Identify students at risk through universal screening
Suggest evidence-based interventions
Generate progress monitoring visuals and summaries
Support personalized and differentiated instruction
Save educator time on administrative and planning tasks
These are meaningful use cases—but they also raise big questions about oversight, validity, and equity.
Key Opportunities We Discuss
In the article, we identify how AI can strengthen MTSS systems by:
Enhancing equity through consistent, data-driven decision-making
Speeding up identification of students in need of Tier 2 and Tier 3 support
Improving fidelity of intervention planning and documentation
Automating data analysis for easier interpretation and visualization
Customizing instruction across all tiers with UDL-aligned resources
Engaging students through AI-generated content aligned to interests
But Also… Six Risks
We also outline six ethical and practical challenges schools must address before integrating AI into MTSS:
Student privacy and FERPA compliance
Bias and equity concerns, particularly for marginalized student groups
Over-reliance on AI that erodes professional judgment
Lack of transparency in “black box” systems
Misinformation and hallucinations, leading to non-evidence-based suggestions
Professional development gaps, especially for frontline educators
These are not abstract concerns—they’re already impacting how districts evaluate AI tools for MTSS. Without thoughtful implementation, AI may reproduce the very inequities MTSS aims to resolve.
The Role of School Psychologists
One of our central arguments is that school psychologists are uniquely equipped to lead AI integration within MTSS. Our training in data-based decision-making, intervention systems, and ethical practice makes us well-positioned to:
Guide tool selection and district policy development
Advocate for human-in-the-loop safeguards
Monitor for bias across student groups
Design and deliver professional development
Evaluate whether tools align with evidence-based practices
Bottom Line
This article is part of a growing body of work exploring how AI is transforming practice in school psychology and education more broadly. We hope it serves as a practical and ethical roadmap for school psychologists, administrators, and educators navigating the integration of AI into MTSS systems.
Citation:
Reichart, K. D., Lockwood, A. B., & Bohanon, H. S. (under review). AI-Driven Systems in MTSS: Potential Opportunities and Challenges. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gpd36_v1