Lockwood Educational & Psychological Consulting

View Original

AI in Psychology: Insights from the 2024 APA Practitioner Survey

Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio

2024 APA Survey

Want to stay informed about the rapidly evolving intersection of AI and school psychology practice? Sign up for my weekly newsletter where I explore these emerging issues and their implications for our field.

The 2024 Practitioner Pulse Survey by the American Psychological Association offers a fascinating snapshot of how psychologists are navigating AI—from adoption rates to ethical concerns—in their professional practices. This blog explores the key findings and takeaways from the survey, shedding light on the profession's cautious but growing engagement with AI.

Adoption of AI in Psychology

  • Limited Usage:

    • 71% of psychologists had not used AI tools at work in the last 12 months.

    • Only 11% used AI tools monthly, and 12% used them several times a year.

    • Early career psychologists were more likely to adopt AI compared to their more senior counterparts.

  • Common Applications: Among psychologists who used AI:

    • 58% used it for writing assistance (e.g., drafting emails).

    • 36% used it for generating content.

    • 29% employed AI for summarization tasks like clinical notes.

    • 27% leveraged AI for note-taking or dictation.

    • Less common uses included task automation, clinical diagnosis support, data analysis, and chatbots for clients.

Attitudes Toward AI

  • Knowledge and Concerns:

    • 50% of psychologists felt knowledgeable about AI, but a significant portion (52%) were unsure of its benefits.

    • 27% worried that AI could make parts of their job obsolete, though this concern was lower than among U.S. workers generally (41%).

  • Perceived Benefits:

    • Top benefits cited included operational efficiency (33%), data summarization (21%), patient education (20%), and reducing burnout (12%).

    • Frequent AI users reported more positive impacts, especially in improving operational efficiencies.

  • Primary Concerns:

    • 59% were concerned about potential data breaches.

    • 54% highlighted risks of biased input leading to biased output and unanticipated social harms.

    • 51% worried about a lack of rigorous testing and validation.

Future Use of AI

  • Predictions for Adoption:

    • Psychologists were divided on future AI use, with 35% planning to adopt it in the next three years, 27% not planning to use it, and 38% undecided.

    • Those who had already used AI tools were more inclined to continue using them.

  • Career Stage Influence:

    • Early career psychologists reported higher usage and a greater willingness to use AI tools in the future than senior psychologists.

    • 46% of early career psychologists intended to use AI tools in the next three years, compared to only 29% of late-career psychologists.

AI's Role in the Profession

  • Operational Support:

    • AI's role is largely seen as augmenting administrative and operational tasks rather than replacing clinical judgment.

    • Frequent users of AI reported higher satisfaction with its contributions to productivity.

  • Ethical and Practical Challenges:

    • Skepticism remains prevalent due to ethical concerns, including transparency, accuracy (avoiding "hallucinations"), and the replacement of human expertise.

Key Takeaways

  • Psychologists use AI tools less than U.S. workers; 35% vs. 11% reported using AI at least monthly in 2024.

  • They are also less likely to believe AI will make their job obsolete (27% vs. 41% among U.S. workers), possibly reflecting their limited exposure to the power of AI.

  • The more knowledgeable psychologists were about AI, the more frequently they used it.

  • Many psychologists are unsure of AI's benefits, indicating a need for clear use cases and training.

  • Infrequent users were more likely to report concerns about social harms, while frequent users were much more concerned about inaccurate output.

Conclusion

The results of the 2024 Practitioner Pulse Survey highlight psychologists' tentative embrace of AI. While the potential for AI to streamline administrative tasks and enhance efficiency is clear, significant concerns—from data security to ethical implications—persist. As the field continues to evolve, it’s crucial for psychologists to engage with AI thoughtfully, ensuring that its integration supports both ethical practice and the profession’s human-centered mission. For those of us in the mental health field, understanding these trends is vital as we navigate the intersection of innovation and care.

Stay connected with the latest developments in AI and school psychology! Sign up for my weekly newsletter where I dive deep into these important issues, provide practical guidance, and explore how we can thoughtfully integrate AI while maintaining the highest standards of practice in school psychology. Join our community of forward-thinking school psychology professionals as we navigate this transformative period in our field.